Hi Günther, You can use the add-constructors="true" attribute on the <binding> element to have JiBX automatically add constructors where necessary. I didn't think I'd ever had JiBX doing this by default.
Remember that unless you have an explicit constructor for a class you get a default constructor automatically, so the add-constructors="true" option is only needed when you're working with classes which have non-default constructors defined. - Dennis Günther Wieser wrote: > hi, > > wanted to let you know that i found a changed behaviour in jibx > version 1.1.6: prior to 1.1.6, jibx was able to work with classes that > had no default (empty) constructor. with 1.1.6 it complains about > that, but it's sufficient to declare a private default constructor. > this keeps jibx happy and also makes sure that nobody else can > instantiate an instance using the default constructor. > > don't know if this only happens when using jdk 1.4 as we do. > > br, > günther > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
