Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > representations are identical - any reasonable XML process tool should > treat them the same. Why do you need the start tag/end tag form?
Yes, I'm sure those are treated the same. Still I use JiBX for creating some template XML files automatically from some Java API sources and then I'm going to fill-in those XML's manually in normal XML text editor. So if I want to put some content to this tag, I must "open" this tag, add content and close tag. It's inconvenient since there are really many empty tags to be filled-in. > If you really do need this, the only way to generate it would be to > modify one of the IXMLWriter subclasses in the org.jibx.runtime.impl I worked it around by putting some empty String as content by default which causes JiBX to write start/end tag as I desire. Greetings -- Daniel Stankiewicz Software Designer Solita Oy Satakunnankatu 18 A FI-33210 Tampere, Finland Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.solita.fi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
