With the new snapshot I used codegen on same schema and I got the same binding.xml output as with 1.2.1 When I ran the jibx bind compiler (org.jibx.binding.Compile) against that binding.xml I got the same error as before.
Thanks Sachin DSosnoski wrote: > > The generated bindings had problems in a few cases where unnecessary > <structure> elements were being added, and I did simplify the cases I'd > found. I think your example fits one of them, but if you can give the > current code a try it'll let me know for sure. > > Thanks, > > - Dennis > > Dennis M. Sosnoski > SOA and Web Services in Java > Training and Consulting > http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz > Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 > > > > Sachin Mittal wrote: >> This is how the schema is defined in our case: >> <xsd:element name="calendar_campaign_identifier"> >> <xsd:complexType> >> <xsd:sequence> >> <xsd:element name="calendar_campaign_id" type="xsd:int"/> >> </xsd:sequence> >> </xsd:complexType> >> </xsd:element> >> >> Workaround suggested by Thomas before to simplify the binding fixed the >> problem. >> I would try the binding generated by codegen against latest jibx. >> >> I think codegen generates bindings too verbose. There should be a way to >> generate binding simply as: >> <structure test-method="ifCalendarCampaignIdentifier" >> usage="optional" name="calendar_campaign_identifier"> >> <value style="element" name="calendar_campaign_id" >> field="calendarCampaignId"/> >> </structure> >> >> instead of (generated by codegen): >> <structure test-method="ifCalendarCampaignIdentifier" >> usage="optional"> >> <structure get-method="getCalendarCampaignId" >> set-method="setCalendarCampaignId" name="calendar_campaign_identifier"> >> <value style="element" name="calendar_campaign_id" type="int"/> >> </structure> >> </structure> >> >> My be we need more ways to configure codegen. >> >> Thanks >> Sachin >> >> >> DSosnoski wrote: >> >>> Hi Sachin, >>> >>> There's no reason for you to add a <format> definition for int, since >>> JiBX gives you the handling for this automatically (see >>> http://jibx.sourceforge.net/binding/conversions.html for the full list >>> of default conversions). >>> >>> It looks like the binding is an error in the code generation from >>> schema, though. I'll send you (off-list) a link to a current build so >>> you can see if the problem has been corrected yet. How are >>> calendar_campaign_identifier and calendar_campaign_id defined in your >>> schema? >>> >>> - Dennis >>> >>> Dennis M. Sosnoski >>> SOA and Web Services in Java >>> Training and Consulting >>> http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz >>> Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 >>> >>> >>> >>> Sachin Mittal wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I am getting this above error. >>>> My mapping is as followed: >>>> <structure get-method="getCalendarCampaignId" >>>> set-method="setCalendarCampaignId" name="calendar_campaign_identifier"> >>>> <value style="element" name="calendar_campaign_id" >>>> type="int"/> >>>> </structure> >>>> >>>> Also as per docs I have added a serializer and deserializer methods for >>>> type >>>> int: >>>> <format type="int" serializer="java.lang.String.valueOf" >>>> deserializer="java.lang.Integer.parseInt"/> >>>> >>>> So even after all this its not working and I am getting this error when >>>> binding is compiled: >>>> Error: Need no-argument constructor or factory method for class int; >>>> >>>> Please help. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Sachin >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/sachin_mittal about me: >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT >>> is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. >>> Meet >>> the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & >>> iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like >>> Barbarian >>> Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jibx-users mailing list >>> jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> ----- >> http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/sachin_mittal about me: >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. > Meet > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & > iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com > _______________________________________________ > jibx-users mailing list > jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users > > ----- http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/sachin_mittal about me: -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-no-argument-constructor-or-factory-method-for-class-int-tp23557952p23669081.html Sent from the jibx-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
