Hi Don, That is good news.
Do you have any expected release date? I was actually using 1.2.3-SNAPSHOT (not knowing about the new goals), but for production I had to revert to 1.2.2 (because it is not good policy to have SNAPSHOTS dependencies in final versions and the maven release plugin doesn't even allow it). Regards, Miguel On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 03:08 -0800, Don Corley wrote: > Miguel, > > > This issue has been solved in JiBX 1.2.3. We are attempting to get > this release out the door soon. > > > The new jibx plugin has goals for generating schema code > (test-schema-codegen) and binding (test-bind) during the test phase. > > > To use the new code, please check it out of the cvs dev repository and > build it. ie., type: > > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@jibx.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/jibx co > -P maven-jibx-plugin > cd maven-jibx-plugin > mvn install > mvn site (this will install the new documentation on your hard disk at > target/site > (ignore any warnings) > > This will overwrite your maven-jibx-plugin version 1.2.2 with the new > code. > Now try to build your maven project. It should work as expected. > Thanks, > Don > > > ---quoted > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:22:35 +0000 > From: Miguel <mig...@almeida.at> > Subject: [jibx-users] Jibx an Maven: how to have different profiles > for testing and production > To: jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Message-ID: <1295094155.3648.11.camel@itcd001> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > Dear all, > > > I use Maven and the jibx-maven plugin. I have a conceptual doubt > regarding the usage of both with testing. > > > While testing the jibx components I have some *bindingTest.xml > bindings. While these are useful for testing purposes, they shouldn't > be > in the production environment. Moreover, I might even have two > conflicting bindings (ie, relating to the same class), like > PersonbindingTest.xml and Personbinding.xml > > > Now, because Jibx uses bytecode enhancement, this means that if I > package my classes in Maven and run the tests, I believe the packaged > file will contain bindingTest's bytecode enhancement, even if, in > Maven, > I tell it not to package the bindingTest.xml files. > > > My current "hack" for this problem involves creating two maven > profiles > in the jibx-plugin (see http://pastebin.com/GbDVP54d ): one is invoked > in the testing goal, the other in the packaging goal. > > > The tests fail, however, if I run the package goal without "skip > tests", > because *bindingTest.xml files were not used. > Is there a configuration I am not seeing that allows us to run the > bindingTest.xml to perform the test, but ignores these files (and > deletes the corresponding bytecode enhanced classes) in the packaging > phase? > > > > > All input welcome! > > > > > Miguel Almeida > ---- quoted > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks > Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand > malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you > can protect your company and customers by using code signing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl > _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list > jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ jibx-users mailing list jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
