Hi Klaus,
The only case where a null collection would make sense would be when
there's a wrapper element around the collection, and the presence or
absence of that element is indicated by a non-null/null value of the
collection. But in the case you quote there is no wrapper element, so
the usage="optional" on the collection element doesn't have any benefit.
I'll take a look at making the binding work the way it did before to
eliminate the problem.
I'll also make a pass over the latest bugs, and work with Don to get a
1.2.4 release out by the end of October, so that everyone has easy
access to fixes made since the last release.
JiBX 2.0 is a longer term issue. I do have some good preliminary work
I've already done, but it's still a long ways from working. I'm going to
try to get back to that before the end of the year.
- Dennis
Dennis M. Sosnoski
Java SOA and Web Services Consulting <http://www.sosnoski.com/consult.html>
Axis2/CXF/Metro SOA and Web Services Training
<http://www.sosnoski.com/training.html>
Web Services Jump-Start <http://www.sosnoski.com/jumpstart.html>
On 08/26/2011 11:35 PM, k.clas...@web.de wrote:
Hello, I would like to upgrade to JIBX 1.2.3 (from 1.2.1) although
there are several major changes (code generation) which force me to
refactor my code. But I hope to get an up to date version with changes
that will also be relevant for the planned 2.0 release. Unfortunately
there is a bug left (changed collection behavior) which I submitted
and which is not assigned/commented so far:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-449 Without a bugfix or a
workaround (or maybe just telling me what I did wrong) I can not
upgrade. Don Corley mentioned a next version 1.2.4 in another bug
report of mine. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JIBX-450 I now wonder
what the current release plan is. Will there be any new release
(1.2.4/2.0) in the nearest future? Which open issues will be fixed?
Actually I am interested in the question if I can get around the
JIBX-449 bug somehow. I understand that "the actual development
schedule depends on the needs of commercial clients" like mentioned on
the JIBX status page (http://jibx.sourceforge.net/status.html) but I
think it is also important that community requests are proper handled
(I would be glad about just some kind of reaction - I do not expect an
immediate solution!). Thus, if any of you can give me some information
about the current JIBX project status - I would be glad and thankful!
Regards Klaus
Schon gehört? WEB.DE hat einen genialen Phishing-Filter in die
Toolbar eingebaut! *http://produkte.web.de/go/toolbar*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient.
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
