Correct.
If all you want to do is generate Java files from an XSD, then JiBX may or
may not be the best tool. There are others out there that do
that<https://www.google.com/search?q=generate+java+from+XSD+schema>
.
The JiBX tool for generating Java files is geared towards ultimately using
them with JiBX. That's why it also generates a binding file.
-Archie
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Alan Evangelista
<ala...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>wrote:
> Which tool I should use to generate a Java source file using a bindings
> file and a xsd schema file as input? I thought that codegen was that
> tool, but it doesn't use binding as input.
>
> If I understood your explanation, I don't need to use the Jibx compiler
> because I don't need to output modified Java classes as my Java classes
> will never be marshalled/unmarshalled during runtime. I just want to
> automate the conversion from xsd to Java source files.
>
--
Archie L. Cobbs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
jibx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
