On Tuesday, February 27 2007 11:08 am, Jesse Vincent wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:47:17AM -0500, Henry Baragar wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 27 2007 09:53 am, Jesse Vincent wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:51:19AM -0500, Henry Baragar wrote: [stuff deleted] > > At the same time, are you up for helping to update the documentation so > that nobody else gets bitten by the same issue? > I am considering helping out in this way. Let me get my project to a better state before starting to look for contributions from me.
> Note also that Jifty::Collection objects load the records and uses the same > methods for accessor access control. > > > Otherwise, because of my mistaken assumptions and the code we have > > developed based on those assumptions, our application behaves > > unpredictably in corner situations. At worst, this could open a avenue > > for attack: at best, it could affect my reputation because my application > > appears to be flaky. > > I'd certainly like to work to help resolve this issue for you, though > I'm not sure that the current behaviour could be changed without losing > the "standard" way to do things. > Thank you for your offer. At this point, I think that the best way is for you to continue as you have supporting the community on this mailing list. I guess the big question is "What is the standard way of doing things?". I think many of the Jifty standards ways I have only found through trial and error. Once I have found them, I have come to appreciate the approach and try my best to leverage their power. Has anyone considered writing a book? Regards, Henry > -jesse _______________________________________________ jifty-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel
