On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:27 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > In imported templates, the invocant is an object blessed into the > class into which the templates were imported. > > In aliased templates, the invocant is an object blessed into the class > from which the templates were aliased.
Turns out that in neither case is an object passed. It looks like an object is *never* passed. It's a class name. This, to me, makes the distinction even less important. > Is this an important distinction? The tests in t/aliasing.t and t/ > importing.t demonstrate it quite clearly, but I'm wondering whether > anyone ever noticed this or if it's necessary? To me, the behavior of > aliases is a bit weird, since they're supposed to be like mixins. The questions still stand, though. Best, David _______________________________________________ jifty-devel mailing list jifty-devel@lists.jifty.org http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel
