On Dec 7, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Jesse Vincent wrote: >> Well, none of the other keywords are imperative. It's `template`, not >> `create_template`. Similarly for language keywords for declaring things >> (`sub`, `method`, `class`, etc.). > > I guess my thought process was that none of the other keywords actually > are imperative - they don't apply action at a distance.
Yeah, but it's an inconsistent interface. I get that you might want to have some sort of marker to demonstrate that it differentiates a bit, but it just seems too weird to me given the rest of T::D. >> Things don't resolve that way, really. Templates already resolve to paths; >> so should wrappers. > > *grumble* Given that, I think we should prohibit wrappers from wrapping > things outside the namespace they contain. IE, absolute "/" would be either > be defined as the root of the current package OR it would be forbidden. Why would you want to limit it in that way? Personally, I might want to put wrappers in their own packages and import them where appropriate. Best, David _______________________________________________ jifty-devel mailing list jifty-devel@lists.jifty.org http://lists.jifty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jifty-devel
