> That is, I admit, somewhat cryptic. I'm writing up a longer note that
> will explain the background and the new approach in more detail.
Looking forward to seeing the note very much!
Best Regard!
Tang
mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
2013/8/28 15:50 -0700, Tim Boudreau <niftin...@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:27 PM, <mark.reinh...@oracle.com> wrote:
I've created a new forest, http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake, where
we're going to explore a simplified approach to achieving the goals of
this Project.
Simplified how?
That's partly answered in the very next paragraph:
Among other things, we're going to see whether we can get away without
introducing a distinct "module mode" as we have in the current prototype
(which is incompatible, in some narrow yet deep ways, with long-standing
behavior) and without doing dependence resolution (since build tools like
Maven, Ivy, and Gradle already do that well enough).
That is, I admit, somewhat cryptic. I'm writing up a longer note that
will explain the background and the new approach in more detail.
- Mark
--
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Tang Yong
Senior Engineer
GlassFish Committer (OSGi & OSGi-JavaEE)
OSGi Alliance Supporter
Blog: http://osgizone.typepad.com/tangyong/
Nanjing Fujitsu NanDa Software Tec CO.,LTD
http://www.fujitsu.com/cn/fnst
Tel: +86-25-86630566-8310
Fax: +86-25-83317685
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
