On 02/11/2015 20:02, Ali Ebrahimi wrote:
:
layer2.modules() [module com.foo, module com.bar] layer1.modules()
[module com.baz, module com.bar] foo.canRead(bar2) -> false
foo.canRead(bar1) -> false
Thanks, I see the issue. The reason it didn't duplicate for me is
because I hadn't dropped the requires com.bar.
So the bug is implied readability across layers when the same named
module exists in multiple layers. In this case com.foo should read
com.bar@1. The com.bar (@2) is the same configuration as com.foo is
confusing the code. We'll need to fix this.
-Alan
