On 04/12/2015 15:52, David M. Lloyd wrote:
Ah, yeah specifically I'm referring to splitting/merging or upgrading some given module in an existing system, possibly using aggregate modules for compatibility or alternatively updating the module descriptors of existing installed modules to accommodate the new layout (both cases seem reasonable to me, and we have done both). The phrase in the original email from Alex that I was responding to was "We don't think the module declaration will be as fluid as you do"; however our real-world experience shows the opposite.
I don't think I understand what you mean by "new layout". Do you mean file paths? I assume not because module declarations list the dependences as module names. Or maybe you mean there are incompatible changes to modules that impact consumers of those modules?
-Alan.
