On 2016-04-25 15:02, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/04/2016 13:54, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
I think this looks good, but since these WeakPairMaps won't be used
for many applications I wonder if it's worth keeping the
implementation lazy, for example by moving the maps to a holder class:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/scratch/transients.01/
I verified this avoids loading the WeakPairMap class for various
small programs and should be neutral in other regards.
This looks like it saves loading one class and not sure that it's
worth it. Also I expect there will be quite a bit of refactoring and
changes as we work through issues over the next months few months.
Sure - also saves creating and holding the three maps eagerly - but I
agree the saving might not justify the added complexity in this case.
/Claes
