On 16/05/2016 18:28, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
You are right, Alan. Thank you.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8156972/webrev.01/

I have also tried to think of a better message, since it is UOE not and not ISE 
… but decided it is descriptive enough as it is.

I think UOE is better here. My comment about the @throws was to put it in the javadoc. It doesn't have to be in the throws declaration because it's unchecked but no big deal.

I'm happy to sponsor this change.

-Alan

Reply via email to