Hi guys! I found the solution for my problem. Maybe this information can be important for other developer. If you desire to run JIGSAW project's examples cod, so you need download open-jdk-9 with jigsaw project: https://jdk9.java.net/jigsaw/. It appears obvious, but I didn't know.
Thank you. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Everson Ferreira da Cunha Junior < everson.c.jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jon. > What's recommend to do ? Do I need to find other version case it exists? > I've read some information about this problem. It advice to add this > project into jdk 9. Is it correct? > > Thanks guys! > On May 16, 2016 11:45, "Jonathan Gibbons" <jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> In general, it's not practical to go back and fix updates to older >> releases so that the compiler is cognisant of all syntax changes >> in subsequent releases, especially changes in features that are >> still under development. >> >> For example, it's possible that the original submitter was using >> a recent version of javac, but just not recent enough. [1] >> Should we have had forward looking error detection in early >> builds of JDK 9 as well? >> >> The submitter provided very little information in his post, just >> referring to a "example of guide on Ubuntu Linux'." It would >> make more sense to ensure that any such guides reference >> the minimal JDK version and build required for the content they >> contain. >> >> -- Jon >> >> [1] >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-March/003877.html >> >> On 05/15/2016 07:22 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >> >>> It would be helpful in the next update to emit an error message specific >>> to >>> finding the "module" keyword and report it's only available in -source 9. >>> That kind of little stuff can go a long way in helping users. >>> On May 15, 2016 2:32 PM, "Alan Bateman" <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 15/05/2016 19:46, Remi Forax wrote: >>> >>> Hi Everson, >>>> let start with a simple question, >>>> do you have checked that you use the java 9 version of javac (javac >>>> -version) ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Right, the output looks like JDK 8 or older is being used. >>>> >>> -Alan. >>> >> >>
