>>>> Er, I thought the plan was for the set of concealed packages to be the >>>> same. It's okay for the ConcealedPackages in the base section to include >>>> "empty" packages. >>> >>> I wasn’t involved with that decision. Chris wrote that code, perhaps he >>> can comment. >> >> This surprises me, as I have the same recollection as Alan; no additional >> concealed packages are allowable in the versioned section. >> >> I just checked the jar tool, and it does NOT add any versioned specific >> concealed packages. > > > If a JAR file contains an empty directory, should `q` be considered as a > concealed package in the base section? > > $ jar -t --file hi.jar > META-INF/ > META-INF/MANIFEST.MF > module-info.class > p/Hi.class > q/ > > currently not: > > $ jar -d --file mr.jar > hi > requires mandated java.base > conceals p
Is a jar tool that takes a -d option lurking somewhere? The latest one I have does not have that option.
