On 09/27/2016 12:59 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/09/2016 11:41, Andrew Haley wrote:
Sorry, this should be simple, but I don't get it.
In this program:
import java.util.logging.Logger;
public class TestClass {
}
aph@arm64:~/SPECjvm2016/unpack$
~/hs-comp/build/linux-aarch64-normal-server-release/images/jdk/bin/javac
--add-reads
java.compiler=java.logging,java.prefs,java.desktop,ALL-UNNAMED
-Xmodule:java.compiler TestClass.java
TestClass.java:1: error: package java.util.logging does not exist
import java.util.logging.Logger;
^
1 error
aph@arm64:~/SPECjvm2016/unpack$ cat TestClass.java
I'm a bit baffled.
javac could probably emit a better message here. In any case, can you
add `--add-modules java.logging` to this. The issue is that you are
compiling TestClass "as if" it's in the java.compiler module but that
module does not require java.logging. There has been suggestions that
--add-reads should imply --add-modules but no conclusion on that.
-Alan
Perhaps it is better to separate those two things. For convenience,
there could be another option like --add-requires that would imply both
--add-reads and --add-modules...
Regards, Peter
