I find this text much more demonstrative of the needs of the many. Thanks for continuing to work through things with the community and understand needs that we all have for a good path forward which allows everyone to use JDK9 and for the future to hold a much better view of encapsulation without the pain of needing to unscrew the whole framework to get to details that are vital today.
Gregg > On Oct 27, 2016, at 11:07 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > > Thanks to everyone who commented on the weak-modules proposal. I've > just posted a third proposal for #ReflectiveAccessToNonExportedTypes, > along with an analysis of the proposals presented thus far: > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-experts/2016-October/000430.html > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-experts/2016-October/000431.html > > Further comments most welcome, as usual! > > - Mark
