2016/12/5 6:15:48 -0800, tjwat...@us.ibm.com: > This makes sense to me, I agree that it makes sense, though it does take away the ability to run a modular JAR easily as an unnamed module -- I don't know how important that is to anyone.
> but then I wonder if the main class is specified > in the module-info.class as some type of service or if you continue to > specify that in the jar manifest. If we do implement this then the logical approach would be to interpret the `MainClass` attribute of the `module-info.class` file. - Mark
