Thanks Alan, so I withdraw my snarky comment. Rémi
On December 9, 2016 12:25:19 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: >On 08/12/2016 14:41, Remi Forax wrote: > >> Chris, >> this patch is rather ugly. >> Patching the ModuleDescriptor is not a good idea, maybe it's means >that we need a system of metadata associated with a ModuleDescriptor, >> the hash of a module (which is not part of the module spec but the >OpenJDK implementation) can be also considered as metadata. >> >There is refactoring in flight that drops the JDK-specific meta data >from ModuleDescriptor. Once all the pieces are merged together then it >should look a lot better. > >-Alan. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
