Thanks Alan, Mandy, i was not aware that the ea license was not the same as the openjdk license.
Rémi ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Mandy Chung" <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> > À: "Remi Forax" <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> > Cc: "jigsaw-dev" <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Janvier 2017 18:36:29 > Objet: Re: jlink / legal folder and LICENSE >> On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> On 25/01/2017 10:53, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote: >> >>> : >>> I mean legal/java.base/LICENSE in jdk9. >> >> The EA builds that Oracle publishes on jdk9.java.net have a LICENSE file that >> links to the BCL on oracle.com. AFAIK, this link has not changed, it's not >> really something that we have any control of here. > > Before jdk-9+136, the LICENSE file was in the top level JDK directory with the > following content: > Please refer to http://java.com/license > > It was a bug. The EA builds are under a different click-through license [1] at > download time and so it was removed in jdk-9+136. > >> >> If you are building jdk9/dev yourself then I assume you get the LICENSE file >> that you looking for. >> >> When using jlink to create your own run-time images then the legal notices >> come >> from the packaged modules. >> > > For OpenJDK build, legal/java.base/LICENSE contains OpenJDK license: > http://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html > > Mandy > [1]] https://jdk9.java.net/download/
