On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:13:25 +0100, Stephen Colebourne
<scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
I'm sure there are plenty of other examples on Maven Central. But it
doesn't really matter. Both of these are valid reasons to name a
project with a number at the end. As such, the #VersionsInModuleNames
proposal cannot stand.
Even though I fully agree that it doesn't matter, I have gathered a
list[1] of groupIds+artifacIds which end on a number for some reason. The
list is way too long (almost 30.000) to paste here.
I haven't analyzed it yet, but you can see quite some libraries which are
bridges to a specific version of another library or jdk, hence they need
to include that version in the artifactId.
Robert
[1] https://gist.github.com/rfscholte/48095f061fbed5177355097421d420b7
