Hi,

 

Elasticsearch does not allow setAccessible() anywhere in its code (by security 
policy), except some places in trusted libraries like Apache Lucene for mmap 
unmapping support (but those must use doPrivileged for that), but plugins and 
Elasticsearch’s core cannot call setAccessible. See also Dalibor Topic’s post 
with the paper about SecurityManager usage, if you allow “suppressAccessChecks” 
permission to code you’re f*ked up.

 

Uwe

 

-----

Uwe Schindler

uschind...@apache.org 

ASF Member, Apache Lucene PMC / Committer

Bremen, Germany

http://lucene.apache.org/

 

From: Reto Merz [mailto:reto.m...@abacus.ch] 
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 6:53 PM
To: Uwe Schindler <uschind...@apache.org>; 'Alan Bateman' 
<alan.bate...@oracle.com>
Cc: jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: SecurityManager environments

 

We use the same approach like Elasticsearch (walk through stack trace and check 
caller).
Note that this does not work in any case. For example this will bypass 
checkExit,
sure, in Java 9 this would also need --add-opens to make reflection work:

    Method halt0 = 
Class.forName("java.lang.Shutdown").getDeclaredMethod("halt0", int.class);
    halt0.setAccessible(true);
    halt0.invoke(halt0, 0);

But we can life with that because in our case we just want to find erroneous 
code.
It is impossible to protect a JVM from malicious code (which is executed within 
the JVM) anyway.

Regards
Reto



Von: Uwe Schindler <uschind...@apache.org <mailto:uschind...@apache.org> > 
An: 'Alan Bateman' <alan.bate...@oracle.com <mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com> >, 
'Reto Merz' <reto.m...@abacus.ch <mailto:reto.m...@abacus.ch> > 
Kopie: <jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:jigsaw-dev@openjdk.java.net> > 
Gesendet: 06.04.2017 16:25 
Betreff: RE: SecurityManager environments 

Hi, 

> > >> To be honest, we don't see a lot of security manager 
> > >> usage on the server side these days. 
> > 
> > I'm really surprised about that. How can a app server or servlet container 
> > like JBoss Tomcat etc guarantee that System.exit does not shut down 
> > the JVM? 
> AFAIK the app servers have to provide a way to run with a security 
> manager but I don't know how many app server run it by default. 
> 
> The System.exit example is a good example that has come up a few times. 
> There is at least one IDE that used to run with a SM so that it could 
> block plugins from calling System.exit. That use case is one that 
> probably needs a specific API. 

Elasticsearch Server also blocks System.exit, so plugins or scripts running 
inside the query cannot shut down the server (it also blocks many other stuff 
for sandboxing everything). The main problem with implementing the exitVM 
permission is to make it work that you can still exit on your own 😊 If you 
forbid exiting the VM, you cannot do it on your own. (cannot be done in a 
policy file, because the exit permission is given by default). 

This is by the way a good use case for the new StackWalker API!: The 
Elasticsearch (and Apache Lucene's Test Runner) SecurityManager do 
Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace() and then walk down the stack and only 
allow exiting if the right class/package is on the stack trace right before the 
 System/Runtime.exit() call. E.g., 

<https://github.com/elastic/securesm/blob/master/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/SecureSM.java#L199-L249>
 
<https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/bootstrap/Security.java#L119>
 

I agree some improvements to SecurityManager around that would be good. It is 
really hard to implement that (only allow existing from a specific 
class/method), as you need to inspect stack, otherwise you cannot exit on your 
own... The code here is still known as "Uwe Schindler" algorithm in the 
community, originating from Apache Lucene and was just forked in Elasticsearch. 
They made a Maven package out of it (SecureSM is taking a list of packages that 
are allowed to exit the VM): 
<http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.elasticsearch%22%20AND%20a%3A%22securesm%22>
 

Uwe 

Reply via email to