On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:10 AM, David M. Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Just the fact that there is the *very idea* of a "fit"/"non-fit" for JPMS > is sad though. It should have been the ubiquitous thing that everyone was > expecting. But denying multiple versions? Blowing up on run time cycles? > Reneging on the idea of being the basis of Java EE 9? These are things that > people will not be expecting. Some extra feedback: I delivered a talk yesterday at QCon SP and people were very much disappointed with these limitations, and also the fact packages must be defined by a single module even if they are not exported, because it was considered nearly impossible to track in real world scenarios. Regards, Michael
