Use “9” instead of “1.9”
> On Oct 28, 2017, at 7:12 AM, Michael Hall <mik3h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think I may of raised this as an issue sometime earlier.
>
> I filed a bug report through bug report.java
> We will review your report and have assigned it an internal review ID :
> 9051382 .
>
> But as I recall earlier it was indicated that this involved files owned by
> Apple. For one thing I think they seem to symbolic link files in an apple
> legacy java Framework.
> The solution as I remember it was for Mike Swingler to update the files. This
> doesn’t seem like something you would want him to continue doing on an
> ongoing basis.
>
> For now I looked at it again because there seems to be nothing at all
> pointing to the jlink command for me.
>
> echo `which jdeps` is here
> /usr/bin/jdeps is here
>
> echo `which jlink` is here
> is here
>
> Nothing ‘is here’
>
> What didn’t seem appropriate to the bug report is /usr/libexec/java_home.
> This has been a useful platform specific command line tool for some time.
> Currently it is somewhat broken.
> This works…
> /usr/libexec/java_home
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-9.jdk/Contents/Home
>
> This didn’t seem to work but now does seem to but with a incorrect(?) error
> message.
> /usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.9 --exec java -version
> Unable to find any JVMs matching version "1.9".
> java version "9"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9+181)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9+181, mixed mode)
>
> Is this supported? Did Apple contribute this to the port? Would anyone be
> making changes to it or is it possible to get the source to change on your
> own?
>
>
