> On Nov 28, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Michael Hall <mik3h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Unless it does relate to current problems. I haven’t had a chance to test JMX
> again yet.
That does seem to work. So java.corba was a answer there if not the best.
js> jmxAttach('994')
local
service:jmx:rmi://127.0.0.1/stub/rO0ABXN9AAAAAQAlamF2YXgubWFuYWdlbWVudC5yZW1vdGUucm1pLlJNSVNlcnZlcnhyABdqYXZhLmxhbmcucmVmbGVjdC5Qcm94eeEn2iDMEEPLAgABTAABaHQAJUxqYXZhL2xhbmcvcmVmbGVjdC9JbnZvY2F0aW9uSGFuZGxlcjt4cHNyAC1qYXZhLnJtaS5zZXJ2ZXIuUmVtb3RlT2JqZWN0SW52b2NhdGlvbkhhbmRsZXIAAAAAAAAAAgIAAHhyABxqYXZhLnJtaS5zZXJ2ZXIuUmVtb3RlT2JqZWN002G0kQxhMx4DAAB4cHc4AAtVbmljYXN0UmVmMgAADTE5Mi4xNjguMS4xMDcAAMN5yW1cOzyQxCai3JwsAAABYATKoHeAAQB4
addr
service:jmx:rmi://127.0.0.1/stub/rO0ABXN9AAAAAQAlamF2YXgubWFuYWdlbWVudC5yZW1vdGUucm1pLlJNSVNlcnZlcnhyABdqYXZhLmxhbmcucmVmbGVjdC5Qcm94eeEn2iDMEEPLAgABTAABaHQAJUxqYXZhL2xhbmcvcmVmbGVjdC9JbnZvY2F0aW9uSGFuZGxlcjt4cHNyAC1qYXZhLnJtaS5zZXJ2ZXIuUmVtb3RlT2JqZWN0SW52b2NhdGlvbkhhbmRsZXIAAAAAAAAAAgIAAHhyABxqYXZhLnJtaS5zZXJ2ZXIuUmVtb3RlT2JqZWN002G0kQxhMx4DAAB4cHc4AAtVbmljYXN0UmVmMgAADTE5Mi4xNjguMS4xMDcAAMN5yW1cOzyQxCai3JwsAAABYATKoHeAAQB4
Url
service:jmx:rmi://127.0.0.1/stub/rO0ABXN9AAAAAQAlamF2YXgubWFuYWdlbWVudC5yZW1vdGUucm1pLlJNSVNlcnZlcnhyABdqYXZhLmxhbmcucmVmbGVjdC5Qcm94eeEn2iDMEEPLAgABTAABaHQAJUxqYXZhL2xhbmcvcmVmbGVjdC9JbnZvY2F0aW9uSGFuZGxlcjt4cHNyAC1qYXZhLnJtaS5zZXJ2ZXIuUmVtb3RlT2JqZWN0SW52b2NhdGlvbkhhbmRsZXIAAAAAAAAAAgIAAHhyABxqYXZhLnJtaS5zZXJ2ZXIuUmVtb3RlT2JqZWN002G0kQxhMx4DAAB4cHc4AAtVbmljYXN0UmVmMgAADTE5Mi4xNjguMS4xMDcAAMN5yW1cOzyQxCai3JwsAAABYATKoHeAAQB4
Shows how I kept coming up with the same url. But now it’s not saying that rmi
isn’t a valid protocol. So I can again script JMX with javascript.
Yet again. Thanks.
