On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:03 AM Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 19/07/2018 15:14, David Lloyd wrote: > > I've run into a problem with the change in java.se resolution. There > > is, from what I can tell, no way to add the java.se module to the > > runtime that doesn't also break on Java 8. > I think you need to explain what you are doing. JDK 8 doesn't know > anything about modules or the "java.se" aggregator module. Is it > possible that this is code that wants to fail if run on a run-time image > that doesn't contain "java.se"?
When running on Java 9 or later, this code relies on being able to reference java.se, and more importantly, all of the modules that it includes, which worked OK on 9 and 10 but fails on 11. When running on Java 8, it uses the default parent class loader to load the relevant classes and resources. -- - DML
