On 30/09/2018 18:01, Ralph Goers wrote:
:
As for the discussion on why the module info was placed into
META-INF/versions/9, I brought up issues with tools that were trying to use
Log4j and couldn’t handle finding a class compiled with Java 9 among other
classes compiled with Java 7. The suggestion was made to move it into
META-INF/version/9 so it would be ignored - which did help with some tools but
not others. For example, I think Android still has not been fixed.
There was a thread on core-libs-dev in Dec 2017 with subject line
"Android and Log4j". I see Martin Buchholz replied to say that the
issues with the Android tools were fixed:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-December/050382.html
In the thread I see Uwe Schindler suggested moving the module-info.class
META-INF/versions/9 but I don't think it was established if that worked
around the limitations of the tools or not. One of the linked issues in
the discussion suggests these tools weren't unpdaetd to ignore class
files in META-INF until recently:
https://issuetracker.google.com/u/0/issues/77587908
-Alan.
