I'd be happy to see Google joining the discussion, but Android (as in the Java "clone") is totally unrelated to OpenJDK so I think it is unlikely to see relevant input from that side. However, OpenJDK works great on Android-devices (and can be used to create Android apps and upload them to stores), so *developers* targeting those devices are covered.
What I hope to accomplish is to first of all get a discussion about the potential options for developers dealing with platform-specific (native and Java) code. It would be great if there was support at the specification level for this best-practice, but that is probably something for the longer term, as it will require more resources and lots of analysis, to make sure backward compatibility is not broken. - Johan On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:52 PM Samuel Audet <samuel.au...@gmail.com> wrote: > I certainly hope so! But I don't see anyone, for example, from Google > representing Android, so what do we hope to accomplish, exactly? Let's > start by making the goals clear. > > Samuel > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 16:35 Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:55 AM Samuel Audet <samuel.au...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> If it wants to remain relevant, OpenJDK should really consider having a >>> broader discussion about this. >>> >> ... >> >>> Please, please, do consider fixing the JDK instead of talking about >>> coming up with incompatible "solutions"! >>> >> >> I totally agree, but I believe this is exactly what we are doing now? >> >> - Johan >> >
