> On 3 Dec 2021, at 15:33, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 03/12/2021 13:39, Michał Kłeczek wrote: >> Am I missing something? >> > I think you understand it correctly. The notion of multi-parent configuration > and layers is something that was added for those that were focused on interop > with other class loader based systems. It was tracked as issue > #NonHierarchicalLayers [1].
I vaguely remember these discussions but cannot find any rationale for DFS vs BFS. Nevertheless, I was able to solve my problem by replacing original requires with artificially generated random names (to avoid name clashes) and providing (empty) modules having original requires but changed to transitive. I would say: somewhat convoluted way to achieve control over dependency resolution but workable. Thanks, -- Michal
