> > I’m guessing that what’s bothering you isn’t so much the number of > *modules* but the number of JARs. So I think a more general solution than > adding a way to describe “this service is conditional on the presence of X” > would be to allow multiple modules in a single JAR that would contain both > Y and the X-Y-plugin. > > That feature is something we could very much consider (subject to > prioritisation, of course). Would you consider that a satisfactory solution? >
I would be satisfied by this, thanks.
