[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17192481#comment-17192481
 ] 

Weston Pace commented on ARROW-9935:
------------------------------------

I tried that out and Arrow's own S3 implementation does not run into this 
issue.  This would only affect the s3fs implementation.  Either way, this is 
not a big problem for me since I have the workaround and I might switch to the 
builtin implementation anyways if the performance is significantly different.  

> [Python] New filesystem API unable to read empty S3 folders
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-9935
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9935
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Python
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Weston Pace
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: arrow_9935.py
>
>
> When an empty "folder" is created in S3 using the online bucket explorer tool 
> on the management console then it creates a special empty file with the same 
> name as the folder.
> (Some more details here: 
> [https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/user-guide/using-folders.html)]
> If parquet files are later loaded into one of these directories (with or 
> without partitioning subdirectories) then this dataset cannot be read by the 
> new dataset API.  The underlying s3fs `find` method returns a "file" object 
> with size 0 that pyarrow then attempts to read.  Since this file doesn't 
> truly exist a FileNotFoundError is thrown.
> Would it be safe to simply ignore all files with size 0?
> As a workaround I can wrap s3fs' find method and strip out these objects with 
> size 0 myself.
> I've attached a script showing the issue and a workaround.  It uses a public 
> bucket that I'll leave up for a few months.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to