[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17306397#comment-17306397
]
David Li commented on ARROW-981:
--------------------------------
I could take a look for 5.0. Part of me wants to say that comparing against
Protobuf is an apples-to-oranges comparison but it seems this is a common
misconception. (We could perhaps compare both to someone sticking a {{bytes
arrow_record_batch}} in Protobuf and sending that through gRPC and someone
manually encoding data into Protobuf messages.)
> [C++] Write comparable columnar serialization benchmarks versus Protocol
> Buffers / gRPC
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-981
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-981
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Benchmarking, C++
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
>
> This will help with demonstrating quantifiable gains in data serialization
> beyond the benefits of columnar layout (which can also be implemented in
> traditional serialization tools like Protobuf, Thrift, etc.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
