[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17313140#comment-17313140
]
David Li commented on ARROW-10351:
----------------------------------
[~yibocai] interesting, thanks for the results! It seems we should be able to
build this in to Flight directly so that the user doesn't have to worry about
this (also, we could potentially make things like the ring buffer size
configurable).
What is the effect when no compression is used?
> [C++][Flight] See if reading/writing to gRPC get/put streams asynchronously
> helps performance
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-10351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10351
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++, FlightRPC
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Priority: Major
>
> We don't use any asynchronous concepts in the way that Flight is implemented
> now, i.e. IPC deconstruction/reconstruction (which may include compression!)
> is not performed concurrent with moving FlightData objects through the gRPC
> machinery, which may yield suboptimal performance.
> It might be better to apply an actor-type approach where a dedicated thread
> retrieves and prepares the next raw IPC message (within a Future) while the
> current IPC message is being processed -- that way reading/writing to/from
> the gRPC stream is not blocked on the IPC code doing its thing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
