[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dominik Moritz updated ARROW-12303:
-----------------------------------
Description: I found that generators are generally slower than iterators in
most browsers. See
[https://observablehq.com/@domoritz/yield-vs-iterator-vs-callback|https://observablehq.com/@domoritz/yield-vs-iterator-vs-callback.]
. I attached the results for Chrome. We should consider using iterators
instead of generators for iterating over row proxies and vectors. (was: I
found that generators are generally slower than iterators in most browsers. See
[https://observablehq.com/@domoritz/yield-vs-iterator-vs-callback.] I attached
the results for Chrome. We should consider using iterators instead of
generators for iterating over row proxies and vectors. )
> [JS] Use iterators instead of generators in critical code paths
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-12303
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12303
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JavaScript
> Reporter: Dominik Moritz
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2021-04-08 at 09.40.51.png
>
>
> I found that generators are generally slower than iterators in most browsers.
> See
> [https://observablehq.com/@domoritz/yield-vs-iterator-vs-callback|https://observablehq.com/@domoritz/yield-vs-iterator-vs-callback.]
> . I attached the results for Chrome. We should consider using iterators
> instead of generators for iterating over row proxies and vectors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
