[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17352550#comment-17352550
]
Ben Kietzman edited comment on ARROW-12890 at 5/27/21, 3:10 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
To be clear, my statements were conjecture. [~aucahuasi] could you confirm or
tell us your use case for clone()?
Side note: I think the subtlety of communicating how deeply we copy/clone an
object is an excellent recommendation to eschew copying and use construction
instead
was (Author: bkietz):
To be clear, my statements were still conjecture. [~aucahuasi] did I guess
correctly or is there a different use case for clone()?
Side note: I think the subtlety of communicating how deeply we copy/clone an
object is an excellent recommendation to eschew copying and use construction
instead
> Implement arrow::Table::clone() -> std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-12890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12890
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi
> Priority: Major
>
> Implement arrow::Table::clone() -> std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table>
> It should return a new instance (deep copy) of the arrow table data
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
