[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17352596#comment-17352596
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-12890:
--------------------------------------
I think it would be better for an application to implements its own
copy-on-write conventions if it needs to mutate memory. It's unclear that
{{arrow::Table}} is the right data structure to base this on (as opposed to a
lower-level data structure that deals mostly with the {{ArrayData}} containers)
> Implement arrow::Table::clone() -> std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-12890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12890
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi
> Priority: Major
>
> Implement arrow::Table::clone() -> std::shared_ptr<arrow::Table>
> It should return a new instance (deep copy) of the arrow table data
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
