[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17442819#comment-17442819
]
Pradeep Garigipati commented on ARROW-6276:
-------------------------------------------
[~wesm] [~apitrou] Is the following kind of change that is intended ? or the
operator overload should take a scalar of NumericType ?
{code:java}
bool BooleanArray::operator[](int64_t i) const { return GetView(i); }
value_type NumericArray::operator[](int64_t i) const { return GetView(i); }
TypeClass::DayMilliseconds DayTimeIntervalArray::operator[](int64_t i) const {
return GetView(i); }
TypeClass::MonthDayNanos MonthDayNanoIntervalArray::operator[](int64_t i) const
{ return GetView(i); }{code}
> [C++] Add operator[] to some concrete Array implementations?
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-6276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6276
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Wes McKinney
> Assignee: Pradeep Garigipati
> Priority: Major
> Labels: good-first-issue
>
> I have occasionally been in situations where I want to pass in e.g.
> {{Int32Array}} or {{BooleanArray}} into a template that also can accept STL
> sequence types like {{std::vector<bool>}} -- in such cases the main API of
> interest is {{[]}}. Would there be interest in aliasing {{operator[]}} to
> return the result of {{GetView}} (or to deprecate {{GetView}} in favor of
> {{operator[]}})?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
