[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17471905#comment-17471905
]
Eduardo Ponce commented on ARROW-15223:
---------------------------------------
Ahh, now I understand your point. So basically any logical kernel where there
is a duality based on negation, should only have the positive kernel
implementation and allow the use of composition for its complement. Then if
this is the case, the description of {{between}} could maybe state how to
obtain its complement to be clear to the user.
I am ok with this approach. I simply created this issue based on the assumption
of {{{}equal/not_equal{}}}. Should I close this issue then?
> [C++] Implement Not Between ternary kernel
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-15223
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15223
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: C++
> Reporter: Eduardo Ponce
> Priority: Major
> Labels: good-first-issue
> Fix For: 8.0.0
>
>
> Add a specialized {{not_between(arr, left_bound, right_bound)}} kernel
> analogous to {{between()}} in ARROW-9843.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
