[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dominik Moritz resolved ARROW-10220.
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 7.0.0
       Resolution: Implemented

Done in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10371

> [JS] Cache javascript utf-8 dictionary keys?
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-10220
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-10220
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JavaScript
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.1
>            Reporter: Ben Schmidt
>            Assignee: Dominik Moritz
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> String decoding from arrow tables is a major bottleneck in using arrow in 
> Javascript–it can take a second to decode a million rows. For utf-8 types, 
> I'm not sure what could be done; but some memoization would help utf-8 
> dictionary types.
> Currently, the javascript implementation decodes a utf-8 string every time 
> you request an item from a dictionary with utf-8 data. If arrow cached the 
> decoded strings to a native js Map, routine operations like looping over all 
> the entries in a text column might be on the order of 10x faster. Here's an 
> observable notebook [benchmarking that and a couple other 
> strategies|https://observablehq.com/@bmschmidt/faster-arrow-dictionary-unpacking].
> I would file a pull request, but 1) I would have to learn some typescript to 
> do so, and 2) this idea may be undesirable because it creates new objects 
> that will increase the memory footprint of a table, rather than just using 
> the typed arrays.
> Some discussion of how the real-world issues here affect the arquero project 
> is [here|https://github.com/uwdata/arquero/issues/1].
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to