[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ben Kietzman updated ARROW-17311:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
[https://github.com/bombela/backward-cpp] is a neat single-header library which 
allows capture of very expressive stack traces. It is compatible with c++11 and 
is cross platform, I think it would greatly improve error reporting in arrow.



In particular, the stack traces provided by a failed DCHECK are much less 
expressive than they could be and don't include file/line information, while 
the traces added to statuses by {{ARROW_EXTRA_ERROR_CONTEXT}} don't include the 
frame in which the status was constructed- which is frequently the frame which 
we most need information from.

  was:[https://github.com/bombela/backward-cpp] is a neat single-header library 
which allows capture of very expressive stack traces. It is compatible with 
c++11 and is cross platform, I think it would greatly improve error reporting 
in arrow. In particular, the stack traces provided by a failed DCHECK are much 
less expressive than they could be and don't include file/line information, 
while the traces added to statuses by {{ARROW_EXTRA_ERROR_CONTEXT}} don't 
include the frame in which the status was constructed- which is frequently the 
frame which we most need information from.


> [C++] Vendor backward for better stack traces
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-17311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17311
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Ben Kietzman
>            Priority: Major
>
> [https://github.com/bombela/backward-cpp] is a neat single-header library 
> which allows capture of very expressive stack traces. It is compatible with 
> c++11 and is cross platform, I think it would greatly improve error reporting 
> in arrow.
> In particular, the stack traces provided by a failed DCHECK are much less 
> expressive than they could be and don't include file/line information, while 
> the traces added to statuses by {{ARROW_EXTRA_ERROR_CONTEXT}} don't include 
> the frame in which the status was constructed- which is frequently the frame 
> which we most need information from.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to