[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gianluca Ficarelli updated ARROW-17399:
---------------------------------------
    Description: 
When a pandas dataframe is loaded from a parquet file using 
{{{}pyarrow.parquet.read_table{}}}, the memory usage may grow a lot more than 
what should be needed to load the dataframe, and it's not freed until the 
dataframe is deleted.

The problem is evident when the dataframe has a {*}column containing lists or 
numpy arrays{*}, while it seems absent (or not noticeable) if the column 
contains only integer or floats.

I'm attaching a simple script to reproduce the issue, and a graph created with 
memory-profiler showing the memory usage.

In this example, the dataframe created with pandas needs around 1.2 GB, but the 
memory usage after loading it from parquet is around 16 GB.

The items of the column are created as numpy arrays and not lists, to be 
consistent with the types loaded from parquet (pyarrow produces numpy arrays 
and not lists).

 
{code:python}
import gc
import time
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow
import pyarrow.parquet
import psutil

def pyarrow_dump(filename, df, compression="snappy"):
    table = pyarrow.Table.from_pandas(df)
    pyarrow.parquet.write_table(table, filename, compression=compression)

def pyarrow_load(filename):
    table = pyarrow.parquet.read_table(filename)
    return table.to_pandas()

def print_mem(msg, start_time=time.monotonic(), process=psutil.Process()):
    # gc.collect()
    current_time = time.monotonic() - start_time
    rss = process.memory_info().rss / 2 ** 20
    print(f"{msg:>3} time:{current_time:>10.1f} rss:{rss:>10.1f}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print_mem(0)

    rows = 5000000
    df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [np.arange(10) for i in range(rows)]})
    print_mem(1)
    
    pyarrow_dump("example.parquet", df)
    print_mem(2)
    
    del df
    print_mem(3)
    time.sleep(3)
    print_mem(4)

    df = pyarrow_load("example.parquet")
    print_mem(5)
    time.sleep(3)
    print_mem(6)

    del df
    print_mem(7)
    time.sleep(3)
    print_mem(8)
{code}
Run with memory-profiler:
{code:bash}
mprof run --multiprocess python test_pyarrow.py
{code}
Output:
{code:java}
mprof: Sampling memory every 0.1s
running new process
  0 time:       0.0 rss:     135.4
  1 time:       4.9 rss:    1252.2
  2 time:       7.1 rss:    1265.0
  3 time:       7.5 rss:     760.2
  4 time:      10.7 rss:     758.9
  5 time:      19.6 rss:   16745.4
  6 time:      22.6 rss:   16335.4
  7 time:      22.9 rss:   15833.0
  8 time:      25.9 rss:     955.0
{code}

  was:
When a pandas dataframe is loaded from a parquet file using 
{{{}pyarrow.parquet.read_table{}}}, the memory usage may grow a lot more than 
what should be needed to load the dataframe, and it's not freed until the 
dataframe is deleted.

The problem is evident when the dataframe has a {*}column containing lists or 
numpy arrays{*}, while it seems absent (or not noticeable) if the column 
contains only integer or floats.

I'm attaching a simple script to reproduce the issue, and a graph created with 
memory-profiler showing the memory usage.

In this example, the dataframe created with pandas needs around 1.2 GB, but the 
memory usage after loading it from parquet is around 16 GB.

The items of the column are created as numpy arrays and not lists, to be 
consistent with the types loaded from parquet (pyarrow produces numoy arrays 
and not lists).

 
{code:python}
import gc
import time
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow
import pyarrow.parquet
import psutil

def pyarrow_dump(filename, df, compression="snappy"):
    table = pyarrow.Table.from_pandas(df)
    pyarrow.parquet.write_table(table, filename, compression=compression)

def pyarrow_load(filename):
    table = pyarrow.parquet.read_table(filename)
    return table.to_pandas()

def print_mem(msg, start_time=time.monotonic(), process=psutil.Process()):
    # gc.collect()
    current_time = time.monotonic() - start_time
    rss = process.memory_info().rss / 2 ** 20
    print(f"{msg:>3} time:{current_time:>10.1f} rss:{rss:>10.1f}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print_mem(0)

    rows = 5000000
    df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [np.arange(10) for i in range(rows)]})
    print_mem(1)
    
    pyarrow_dump("example.parquet", df)
    print_mem(2)
    
    del df
    print_mem(3)
    time.sleep(3)
    print_mem(4)

    df = pyarrow_load("example.parquet")
    print_mem(5)
    time.sleep(3)
    print_mem(6)

    del df
    print_mem(7)
    time.sleep(3)
    print_mem(8)
{code}
Run with memory-profiler:
{code:bash}
mprof run --multiprocess python test_pyarrow.py
{code}
Output:
{code:java}
mprof: Sampling memory every 0.1s
running new process
  0 time:       0.0 rss:     135.4
  1 time:       4.9 rss:    1252.2
  2 time:       7.1 rss:    1265.0
  3 time:       7.5 rss:     760.2
  4 time:      10.7 rss:     758.9
  5 time:      19.6 rss:   16745.4
  6 time:      22.6 rss:   16335.4
  7 time:      22.9 rss:   15833.0
  8 time:      25.9 rss:     955.0
{code}


> pyarrow may use a lot of memory to load a dataframe from parquet
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-17399
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17399
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Parquet, Python
>    Affects Versions: 9.0.0
>         Environment: linux
>            Reporter: Gianluca Ficarelli
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: memory-profiler.png
>
>
> When a pandas dataframe is loaded from a parquet file using 
> {{{}pyarrow.parquet.read_table{}}}, the memory usage may grow a lot more than 
> what should be needed to load the dataframe, and it's not freed until the 
> dataframe is deleted.
> The problem is evident when the dataframe has a {*}column containing lists or 
> numpy arrays{*}, while it seems absent (or not noticeable) if the column 
> contains only integer or floats.
> I'm attaching a simple script to reproduce the issue, and a graph created 
> with memory-profiler showing the memory usage.
> In this example, the dataframe created with pandas needs around 1.2 GB, but 
> the memory usage after loading it from parquet is around 16 GB.
> The items of the column are created as numpy arrays and not lists, to be 
> consistent with the types loaded from parquet (pyarrow produces numpy arrays 
> and not lists).
>  
> {code:python}
> import gc
> import time
> import numpy as np
> import pandas as pd
> import pyarrow
> import pyarrow.parquet
> import psutil
> def pyarrow_dump(filename, df, compression="snappy"):
>     table = pyarrow.Table.from_pandas(df)
>     pyarrow.parquet.write_table(table, filename, compression=compression)
> def pyarrow_load(filename):
>     table = pyarrow.parquet.read_table(filename)
>     return table.to_pandas()
> def print_mem(msg, start_time=time.monotonic(), process=psutil.Process()):
>     # gc.collect()
>     current_time = time.monotonic() - start_time
>     rss = process.memory_info().rss / 2 ** 20
>     print(f"{msg:>3} time:{current_time:>10.1f} rss:{rss:>10.1f}")
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     print_mem(0)
>     rows = 5000000
>     df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [np.arange(10) for i in range(rows)]})
>     print_mem(1)
>     
>     pyarrow_dump("example.parquet", df)
>     print_mem(2)
>     
>     del df
>     print_mem(3)
>     time.sleep(3)
>     print_mem(4)
>     df = pyarrow_load("example.parquet")
>     print_mem(5)
>     time.sleep(3)
>     print_mem(6)
>     del df
>     print_mem(7)
>     time.sleep(3)
>     print_mem(8)
> {code}
> Run with memory-profiler:
> {code:bash}
> mprof run --multiprocess python test_pyarrow.py
> {code}
> Output:
> {code:java}
> mprof: Sampling memory every 0.1s
> running new process
>   0 time:       0.0 rss:     135.4
>   1 time:       4.9 rss:    1252.2
>   2 time:       7.1 rss:    1265.0
>   3 time:       7.5 rss:     760.2
>   4 time:      10.7 rss:     758.9
>   5 time:      19.6 rss:   16745.4
>   6 time:      22.6 rss:   16335.4
>   7 time:      22.9 rss:   15833.0
>   8 time:      25.9 rss:     955.0
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to