[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17601015#comment-17601015
]
Weston Pace commented on ARROW-17597:
-------------------------------------
I get pretty similar results.
>60 seconds for s3_bucket.
~4 seconds with curl.
For an additional data point I tried downloading from the S3 server with minio
client (mc) and got anywhere from 7 to 10 seconds. So it appears there is some
overhead associated with S3 but not enough to explain the big gap.
> [R][C++] Why is read_csv_arrow so much slower when using S3 path notation?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-17597
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17597
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++, R
> Reporter: Carl Boettiger
> Priority: Minor
>
> Consider these two mechanisms for reading from a public bucket. I was struck
> to see that using S3 path notation was consistently over 20 times slower than
> using the https address directly. I could imagine a small overhead for using
> S3, but compared to other operations this seems something weird is going on
> here:
> {code:java}
> library(arrow)
> targe <- s3_bucket("neon4cast-targets",
> endpoint_override="data.ecoforecast.org", anonymous=TRUE)
> bench::bench_time({ # 58.6 seconds
> ex1 <-
> read_csv_arrow(targe$path("terrestrial_30min/terrestrial_30min-targets.csv.gz"))
> })
> bench::bench_time({ # 2.7 sec
> ex2 <-
> read_csv_arrow("https://data.ecoforecast.org/neon4cast-targets/terrestrial_30min/terrestrial_30min-targets.csv.gz";)
> })
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
