Will Jones created ARROW-17994:
----------------------------------

             Summary: [C++] Add overflow argument is required when it shouldn't 
be
                 Key: ARROW-17994
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17994
             Project: Apache Arrow
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: C++
            Reporter: Will Jones
             Fix For: 11.0.0


If I pass a substrait plan that contains an add function, but don't provide the 
nullablity argument, I get the following error:

{code:none}
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "pyarrow/_substrait.pyx", line 140, in pyarrow._substrait.run_query
  File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 144, in 
pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
  File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 100, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
pyarrow.lib.ArrowInvalid: Expected Substrait call to have an enum argument at 
index 0 but the argument was not an enum.
/Users/willjones/Documents/arrows/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/engine/substrait/extension_set.cc:684
  call.GetEnumArg(arg_index)
/Users/willjones/Documents/arrows/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/engine/substrait/extension_set.cc:702
  ParseEnumArg(call, 0, kOverflowParser)
/Users/willjones/Documents/arrows/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/engine/substrait/relation_internal.cc:332
  FromProto(expr, ext_set, conversion_options)
/Users/willjones/Documents/arrows/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/engine/substrait/serde.cc:156
  FromProto(plan_rel.has_root() ? plan_rel.root().input() : plan_rel.rel(), 
ext_set, conversion_options)
/Users/willjones/Documents/arrows/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/engine/substrait/util.cc:106
  engine::DeserializePlans(substrait_buffer, consumer_factory, registry, 
nullptr, conversion_options_)
/Users/willjones/Documents/arrows/arrow/cpp/src/arrow/engine/substrait/util.cc:130
  executor.Init(substrait_buffer, registry)
{code}

Yet in the spec, this argument is supposed to be optional: 
https://github.com/substrait-io/substrait/blob/f3f6bdc947e689e800279666ff33f118e42d2146/extensions/functions_arithmetic.yaml#L11

If I modify the plan to include the argument, it works as expected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to