[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17621414#comment-17621414
]
David Li commented on ARROW-17783:
----------------------------------
It should also not be too bad to fix this in Flight (given gRPC generally
forces a copy on us anyways); we would only lose the zero-copy in the case that
the batch fits in a single gRPC slice (which is presumably relatively small,
but I'd have to check what a typical size is).
> [C++] Aggregate kernel should not mandate alignment
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-17783
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17783
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0, 8.0.0
> Reporter: Yifei Yang
> Assignee: Weston Pace
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: flight-alignment-test.zip
>
>
> When using arrow's aggregate kernel with table transferred from arrow flight
> (DoGet), it may crash at arrow::util::CheckAlignment(). However using
> original data it works well, also if I first serialize the transferred table
> into bytes then recreate an arrow table using the bytes, it works well.
> "flight-alignment-test" attached is the minimal test that can produce the
> issue, which basically does "sum(total_revenue) group by l_suppkey" using the
> table from "DoGet()". ("DummyNode" is just used to be the producer of the
> aggregate node as the producer is required to create the aggregate node)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)