[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17643480#comment-17643480
 ] 

Apache Arrow JIRA Bot commented on ARROW-17622:
-----------------------------------------------

This issue was last updated over 90 days ago, which may be an indication it is 
no longer being actively worked. To better reflect the current state, the issue 
is being unassigned per [project 
policy|https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/bug_reports.html#issue-assignment].
 Please feel free to re-take assignment of the issue if it is being actively 
worked, or if you plan to start that work soon.

> [C++] Order-aware non-sink Fetch Node
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-17622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17622
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++
>            Reporter: Vibhatha Lakmal Abeykoon
>            Assignee: Vibhatha Lakmal Abeykoon
>            Priority: Major
>
> Considering the existing sink nodes and newly introduced Fetch node with sort 
> capability, we will only need two nodes, "sort", and "fetch" in the long run. 
> Because once the ordered execution is integrated, some features could be 
> removed. Right now, there are three nodes doing somewhat closely related 
> things which is redundant work assuming unordered execution. Namely they are, 
> "order_by_sink", "fetch_sink", and "select_k_sink". So one of them will need 
> to go away at some point and all of them will no longer be sink nodes and 
> sorting behavior will need to be removed from "fetch".
> The task breakdown needs to be determined. Better to keep a few sub-tasks. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to