[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16188863#comment-16188863
]
Stanislav Chizhov commented on KAFKA-6003:
------------------------------------------
Well in the case we had in staging it was out of order sequence exception for
some other topic/partition. I still need to investigate why exactly did that
happen. It does not seem to matter though how you get to that state with no
data for the partition on one of the brokers.
> Replication Fetcher thread for a partition with no data fails to start
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-6003
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6003
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: replication
> Affects Versions: 0.11.0.1
> Reporter: Stanislav Chizhov
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.0.0, 0.11.0.2
>
>
> If a partition of a topic with idempotent producer has no data on 1 of the
> brokers, but it does exist on others and some of the segments for this
> partition have been already deleted replication thread responsible for this
> partition on the broker which has no data for it fails to start with out of
> order sequence exception:
> {code}
> [2017-10-02 09:44:23,825] ERROR [ReplicaFetcherThread-2-4]: Error due to
> (kafka.server.ReplicaFetcherThread)
> kafka.common.KafkaException: error processing data for partition
> [stage.data.adevents.v2,20] offset 1660336429
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:203)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:174)
> at scala.Option.foreach(Option.scala:257)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:174)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:171)
> at
> scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray$class.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:59)
> at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:48)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2.apply$mcV$sp(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:171)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:171)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread$$anonfun$processFetchRequest$2.apply(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:171)
> at kafka.utils.CoreUtils$.inLock(CoreUtils.scala:213)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:169)
> at
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:112)
> at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:64)
> Caused by: org.apache.kafka.common.errors.OutOfOrderSequenceException:
> Invalid sequence number for new epoch: 0 (request epoch), 154277489 (seq.
> number)
> {code}
> We run kafka 0.11.0.1 and we ran into the situation when 1 of replication
> threads was stopped for few days, while everything else on that broker was
> functional. This is our staging cluster and retention is less than a day, so
> everything for partitions for which replication thread was down was cleaned
> up. At the moment we have a broker which cannot start replication for few
> partitions. I was also able to reproduce in my local test environment.
> Another possible use case when this might cause real pain is disk failure or
> any situation when previously deleting all the data for the partition on a
> broker helped - since it would just fetch all the data from other replicas.
> Now it does not work for topics with idempotent producers. It might also
> affect other not-idempotent topics if those are unlucky to share same
> replication fetcher thread.
> This seems to be caused by this logic:
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/0.11.0.1/core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/ProducerStateManager.scala#L119
> and might be fixed in the scope of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5793.
> However any hints on how to get those partition to fully replicated state are
> highly appreciated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
