[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16344398#comment-16344398
]
Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-5253:
----------------------------------------
We should double check the new test artifact, if it can handle Patterns and if
not update accordingly.
> KStreamTestDriver must handle streams created with patterns
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-5253
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5253
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: streams, unit tests
> Affects Versions: 0.10.2.1
> Reporter: Wim Van Leuven
> Priority: Major
>
> *Context*
> KStreamTestDriver is being used to unit test topologies while developing
> KStreams apps.
> One such topology uses a Pattern to consume from multiple topics at once.
> *Problem*
> The unit test of the topology fails because KStreamTestDriver fails to deal
> with Patterns properly.
> *Example*
> Underneath is a unit test explaining what I understand should happen, but is
> failing.
> Explicitly adding a source topic matching the topic pattern, generates an
> exception as the topology builder explicitly checks overlapping topic names
> and patterns, in any order of adding pattern and topic. So, it is intended
> behaviour.
> {code:java}
> @Test
> public void shouldProcessFromSourcesThatDoMatchThePattern() {
> // -- setup stream pattern
> final KStream<String, String> source =
> builder.stream(Pattern.compile("topic-source-\\d"));
> source.to("topic-sink");
> // -- setup processor to capture results
> final MockProcessorSupplier<String, String> processorSupplier = new
> MockProcessorSupplier<>();
> source.process(processorSupplier);
> // -- add source to stream data from
> //builder.addSource(builder.newName(KStreamImpl.SOURCE_NAME),
> "topic-source-3");
> // -- build test driver
> driver = new KStreamTestDriver(builder);
> driver.setTime(0L);
> // -- test
> driver.process("topic-source-3", "A", "aa");
> // -- validate
> // no exception was thrown
> assertEquals(Utils.mkList("A:aa"), processorSupplier.processed);
> }
> {code}
> *Solution*
> If anybody can help in defining the solution, I can create a pull request for
> this change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
