[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17558753#comment-17558753
 ] 

Sagar Rao edited comment on KAFKA-13602 at 6/25/22 10:43 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Hey @florin , I have already sent out a Kip for this. Here is the link : 
[https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211883356.|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211883356]

Review is awaited still. You can also share your review comments on the 
discussion thread!

 


was (Author: sagarrao):
Hey @florin , I have already sent out a Kip for this. Here is the link : 
[https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211883356.|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211883356]


Review is awaited still. 

 

> Allow to broadcast a result record
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-13602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13602
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
>            Assignee: Sagar Rao
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: needs-kip, newbie++
>
> From time to time, users ask how they can send a record to more than one 
> partition in a sink topic. Currently, this is only possible by replicate the 
> message N times before the sink and use a custom partitioner to write the N 
> messages into the N different partitions.
> It might be worth to make this easier and add a new feature for it. There are 
> multiple options:
>  * extend `to()` / `addSink()` with a "broadcast" option/config
>  * add `toAllPartitions()` / `addBroadcastSink()` methods
>  * allow StreamPartitioner to return `-1` for "all partitions"
>  * extend `StreamPartitioner` to allow returning more than one partition (ie 
> a list/collection of integers instead of a single int)
> The first three options imply that a "full broadcast" is supported only, so 
> it's less flexible. On the other hand, it's easier to use (especially the 
> first two options are easy as they do not require to implement a custom 
> partitioner).
> The last option would be most flexible and also allow for a "partial 
> broadcast" (aka multi-cast) pattern. It might also be possible to combine two 
> options, or maye even a totally different idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to