guozhangwang commented on code in PR #12555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12555#discussion_r959844687
##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/internals/InternalStreamsBuilder.java:
##########
@@ -270,16 +272,20 @@ private void maybeAddNodeForOptimizationMetadata(final
GraphNode node) {
// use this method for testing only
public void buildAndOptimizeTopology() {
- buildAndOptimizeTopology(false);
+ buildAndOptimizeTopology(false, false);
}
- public void buildAndOptimizeTopology(final boolean optimizeTopology) {
+ public void buildAndOptimizeTopology(
+ final boolean optimizeTopology, final boolean optimizeSelfJoin) {
mergeDuplicateSourceNodes();
if (optimizeTopology) {
LOG.debug("Optimizing the Kafka Streams graph for repartition
nodes");
optimizeKTableSourceTopics();
maybeOptimizeRepartitionOperations();
+ if (optimizeSelfJoin) {
Review Comment:
Thanks @vpapavas , I think I start to understand some of your motivations
here, but just to make sure I do, could we go over a list of examples below:
1.
```
stream1 = builder.stream("topic1");
stream1.join(stream1)
```
This case is optimizable, and just condition #2 alone should be sufficient
to validate optimization to be applied.
2.
```
stream1 = builder.stream("topic1");
stream2 = builder.stream("topic1"); // same topic
stream1.join(stream2)
```
This case is optimizable, but since from the logical plan we still have two
graph nodes we cannot validate the optimization.
3.
```
stream1 = builder.stream("topic1");
streams1.mapValues(v -> v);
stream2 = builder.stream("topic1"); // same topic
stream1.join(stream2)
```
This case is optimizable, but it seems our validation would exclude it?
4.
```
stream1 = builder.stream("topic1");
stream2 = builder.stream("topic2");
stream3 = stream1.merge(stream2);
stream3.join(stream3);
```
This case should be optimizable, but it seems our validation would exclude
it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]